Rosiglitazone maleate, more commonly known as Avandia, is a prescription drug given to adults with type 2 diabetes to control blood sugar.
Studies revealed Avandia was an unsafe drug because it increased the risk of heart attacks in those who took the drug. More than 13,000 lawsuits have been filed against GlaxoSmithKline, the maker of the Avandia drug. Besides the risk of heart attack, other health risks and injuries associated with the drug include:
If you’ve suffered these or other health issues due to Avandia, you may have a legal claim in connection with the injuries. These types of injuries can be serious and can lead to long-term injury or complications with other health conditions.
People are suing the drug maker based on the claim that the drug is a defective product. A defective product is any product that causes injury to an individual because of a design defect, manufacturing defect, or a failure to warn. The company is accused of not properly warning patients about the risks associated with taking the drug such as increased heart attacks.
Many Avandia lawsuits are filed under the “failure to warn” doctrine. Products must be reasonably safe to use for their intended purpose. A failure to warn indicates the defendant failed to tell about all the dangers associated with the drug, such as when the product fails to include proper warning labels.
A plaintiff must prove the four elements of the failure to warn tort:
If these four elements are met, there is a high likelihood that the plaintiff will be able to recover damages for their injuries or losses. Damages for the injuries can include coverage for such costs as medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other costs. A fatal case can also include wrongful death damages and other types of damages awards.
Besides failure to warn legal theories, some Avandia lawsuits may be based on other product defect theories, such as manufacturing defect and design defect theories. A manufacturing defect occurs where there is some error, failure, or other mishap during the production stage of the product.
With a manufacturing defect, there is generally nothing wrong with the initial design of the product. Instead, the defect is caused by the way the drug is produced. In the context of an Avandia lawsuit, an example of a manufacturing defect can include:
In comparison, a design defect occurs earlier in the process, at the design stage. Here, the error, fault, or defect has to do with the way that the product is designed, envisioned, or formulated. In the context of an Avandia lawsuit, a design defect might involve:
Thus, an Avandia lawsuit might involve various aspects of general product liability law. In some cases, various legal theories can be applied, such as when a product has both a manufacturing and a design defect.
When several persons are all injured by the same type of Avandia defect or issue, it may happen that a class action lawsuit is filed. A class action lawsuit consolidates several claims into one; the group of injured/affected persons are grouped together into a “class”, which allows their claims to pass through the court system in one lawsuit.
This makes the process more streamlined and can help the parties save time and money on the lawsuit. In some cases, class action lawsuits allow the parties to recover more than if they had filed individually.
In some situations, individuals may be required to join the class action lawsuit and not be allowed to file their individual suit until the class action claim has been settled. It will depend on the nature of your claim and if it’s similar or identical to the claim at the heart of the class action lawsuit.
If you or a loved one have been harmed because of taking Avandia, it is in your best interests to obtain a personal injury lawyer near you for help with a legal claim. Your attorney can provide you with guidance in court and legal representation for your case
Last Modified: 08-21-2018 08:03 PM PDTLaw Library Disclaimer
We've helped more than 4 million clients find the right lawyer – for free. Present your case online in minutes. LegalMatch matches you to pre-screened lawyers in your city or county based on the specifics of your case. Within 24 hours experienced local lawyers review it and evaluate if you have a solid case. If so, attorneys respond with an offer to represent you that includes a full attorney profile with details on their fee structure, background, and ratings by other LegalMatch users so you can decide if they're the right lawyer for you.