Brown Act – The Open Meeting Law in California

Where You Need a Lawyer:

(This may not be the same place you live)

At No Cost! 

 What Is the Brown Act in California Law?

The Brown Act, officially known as the Ralph M. Brown Act, is a piece of legislation that was passed in California in 1953. Its main purpose is to guarantee the public’s right to attend and participate in meetings of local legislative bodies.

At the core of this right is the idea of transparency. When legislative body meetings are made accessible to the public—a requirement enshrined in the Open Meeting Act—these bodies operate with greater accountability.

The public can see firsthand the decision-making processes, the debates, and the considerations that shape local policies and regulations. This transparency ensures that elected or appointed officials act in the best interests of their constituents and are held accountable for their actions and decisions.

Allowing the public to participate in these meetings fosters a sense of civic engagement. When citizens can voice their opinions, ask questions, or offer insights on matters under discussion, it creates a more informed and collaborative decision-making process. This direct interaction can lead to better policies that more accurately reflect the needs and desires of the community.

The Brown Act in California is a cornerstone of California’s commitment to open government, ensuring that the actions and deliberations of government agencies and entities are open and transparent to the public.

What Constitutes a Legislative Body?

Under the Brown Act, a legislative body refers to any board, commission, committee, or other body of a local agency, whether permanent or temporary, decision-making or advisory, that is created by charter, ordinance, resolution, or other formal action. This includes city councils, county boards of supervisors, and even certain non-elected bodies like planning commissions.

Subcommittees, even those composed of less than a quorum of the main body, can also be considered a legislative body if they act on behalf of the main body.

What Constitutes a Meeting?

The definition of what constitutes a “meeting” is pivotal to understanding the dynamics of legislative bodies, especially in the context of transparency and public participation.

Congregation of a Majority

The essence of a “meeting” starts with the gathering of more than half of the total members of a legislative body. For instance, if a legislative body consists of five members, any assembly that involves three or more of these members can be designated as a meeting.

Same Time and Location

The members must be present or participating simultaneously for it to qualify as a meeting. This simultaneous participation can occur in both traditional physical environments and modern digital ones, such as teleconferencing platforms. As digital communication has grown, so has the importance of recognizing that meetings can occur in virtual spaces.

Teleconference Locations

In an increasingly digital era, meetings are not restricted to physical rooms. Teleconferencing, which allows members to participate remotely, has become a recognized method for conducting meetings. However, to uphold transparency, teleconferencing should be accessible to the public, ensuring they can listen, participate, and be informed of the proceedings.

To Hear, Discuss, Deliberate, or Take Action

Meetings encompass more than just formal actions or votes. The essence of a meeting is present even when members are merely listening to ideas, discussing potential strategies, or weighing the pros and cons of a decision. Essentially, any form of deliberation or exchange of ideas about official business qualifies.

Any Item Within the Subject Matter Jurisdiction

This refers to any topic or matter that falls under the authority or scope of the legislative body, irrespective of its current status on an official agenda. For example, a city council authorized to oversee city parks would be having a “meeting” if they discuss any aspect of these parks, even if no formal decision or vote is set to occur.

Implicit Scenarios

Beyond the explicit definitions, there are subtler situations that can qualify as meetings. Side conversations during breaks or casual settings might be deemed official if they influence decisions. Sequential discussions, where one member talks to another in a chain, can be seen as bypassing transparency regulations, especially if they lead to unofficial consensus-building without public observation.

What Does Not Constitute a Meeting?

Individual contacts or conversations between a member of a legislative body and any other person do not constitute meetings. Other examples include attendance at conferences or workshops, attendance at social or ceremonial events, or attendance at open and publicized meetings organized by a person other than the legislative body, provided members do not discuss among themselves business of a specific nature that is within their jurisdiction.

How Must the Meetings Be Made Public?

Meetings must be open to the public and held in locations accessible to all residents. An agenda must be posted at least 72 hours prior to regular meetings, clearly listing all items to be discussed or acted upon. For special meetings, a 24-hour notice is required.

All materials provided to a majority of a board or council must also be made available to the public, with certain exceptions like legal or personnel matters.

When Can Legislative Bodies Have Closed Meetings?

Certain matters can be discussed in closed sessions. These include:

Personnel Issues

Personnel matters often delve into private, sensitive information about employees or potential employees. These can include evaluations, promotions, or investigations into possible misconduct. Because discussing such issues in the open can violate privacy rights and potentially lead to undue influence or bias, they are typically addressed in closed sessions. The emphasis here is to protect individual rights and maintain the integrity of personnel decisions.

Conference with Legal Counsel on Litigation

When a legislative body seeks advice from its legal counsel regarding pending litigation, it’s crucial that such consultations remain confidential. Discussing potential legal strategies, risks, or settlements in the public domain can compromise the legal position of the body and disadvantage it in legal proceedings. Thus, these sessions are confidential to protect the legal rights and strategies of the agency.

Discussion of Certain Real Estate Negotiations

Real estate discussions in a public setting can impact property values, negotiating power, or the overall strategy of a legislative body when acquiring or disposing of property. When discussing price, terms of payment, or other intricate details of real estate transactions, it’s in the best interest of the public and the agency to keep these details confidential until decisions are finalized.

Discussions Regarding the Appointment, Discipline, or Dismissal of an Employee

Similar to personnel issues, discussions related to the appointment, discipline, or dismissal of an employee involve sensitive personal matters. Public discussions on these topics can tarnish reputations, violate privacy rights, or even expose the legislative body to potential lawsuits. Closed sessions ensure that employee rights are respected while allowing members to discuss and decide on matters related to employment without external pressures.

However, any action taken in a closed session must be reported publicly at the conclusion of the session or as soon as feasible.

What Is the Punishment for Violating the Brown Act?

Violations of the Brown Act can result in nullifying an agency’s actions, misdemeanor charges against the officials, or both. If a member of a legislative body has been charged and found to have intentionally violated the act, they may be faced with criminal misdemeanor penalties.

If you have any concerns regarding local governance and your rights, it is beneficial to consult with a California lawyer.

Do I Need a Lawyer for Help with My Local Government?

Yes, if you believe your local government or a legislative body has violated the Brown Act or if you have any concerns regarding local governance and your rights, it is beneficial to consult with a lawyer.

A knowledgeable California government lawyer can guide you through the complexities of the Brown Act and represent your interests. If you’re in need of assistance, consider reaching out through LegalMatch to find the right California government lawyer for your needs.

Save Time and Money - Speak With a Lawyer Right Away

  • Buy one 30-minute consultation call or subscribe for unlimited calls
  • Subscription includes access to unlimited consultation calls at a reduced price
  • Receive quick expert feedback or review your DIY legal documents
  • Have peace of mind without a long wait or industry standard retainer
  • Get the right guidance - Schedule a call with a lawyer today!

16 people have successfully posted their cases

Find a Lawyer