Employees of a company or organization may sometimes be suspected of misconduct. In such cases, a manager may feel that there is a need for workplace searches and interrogations. The manager may feel the need to so in order to protect against potential violations of company policies or to protect a company’s assets. However, there is also the need to safeguard the rights of employees, including their right to privacy.
The privacy rights of employees in the workplace are governed by federal and state laws. Most employee privacy rights are determined on a case-by-case basis. Employers may conduct workplace searches and interrogations if they have a reasonable basis for doing so. Moreover, if there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the particular item or place, then the employer may conduct a search. To determine whether there has been an illegal search and/or interrogation, the courts will look at the following factors:
An employer must be very careful when conducting a search or interrogation. It has to be done in a reasonable manner and the employee must not be humiliated or embarrassed. A degrading search or interrogation can lead to potential liability and expensive litigation. An employer can also be subject to a lawsuit if an employee’s consent to a search was brought about through coercion or duress. Some examples of duress or coercion in an employment setting are:
Employers are strongly encouraged to avoid searching the employee’s person. This is because employees have the greatest privacy rights when it comes to any search of their bodies. Rather, the employer may want to limit the search to the belongings, such as purses, bags, wallets or outer clothing.
Employees generally do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in work-placed equipment and tools. For example, employees do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in work computers, desks, and lockers. In fact, employers are generally entitled to monitor the use of computers. For example, employers are allowed to monitor an employee’s internet-surfing history. Because the email system belongs to the employer, employees generally do not have any privacy rights in their emails at work. Moreover, the employer is allowed to monitor the communications of employees. If the employee has a company car, an employer would probably be entitled to search the car.
However, employees would likely have a reasonable expectation of privacy in personal items. Personal items may include purses, wallets, briefcases or luggage. Employers may only search personal items with a court-ordered warrant. For example, an employer would probably not be allowed to go through an employee’s personal car. In the case the employer believes that there are any dangerous or illegal materials in an employee’s car, it is better to call the police.
Some questions to ask yourself in order to determine whether your privacy rights were violated:
A court will also consider whether the employee was a public employee or a private employee. Public employees have greater protection of privacy under the fourth amendment.
If you believe that you were subject to an illegal search or interrogation, there are probably many questions you want answered. Speaking with an employment lawyer as soon as possible may help you understand what your options are and what next steps to take.
Last Modified: 12-08-2017 08:52 AM PSTLaw Library Disclaimer
We've helped more than 4 million clients find the right lawyer – for free. Present your case online in minutes. LegalMatch matches you to pre-screened lawyers in your city or county based on the specifics of your case. Within 24 hours experienced local lawyers review it and evaluate if you have a solid case. If so, attorneys respond with an offer to represent you that includes a full attorney profile with details on their fee structure, background, and ratings by other LegalMatch users so you can decide if they're the right lawyer for you.