If you've been taken into custody and are no longer free to walk away, you've been arrested. The U.S. Constitution authorizes arrests only if the police have "probable cause" to believe that a crime was committed and that the suspect is responsible.
Typically a suspect will be held in a jail or at a police station until the bail is posted or until the arraignment, court hearing for reading of charges against the suspect, has been held. The arraignment must be held within 72 hours of the suspect’s arrest. The police have to release the suspect if they cannot carry the case further.
A suspect in prison has the right to know why they have been arrested and also has the right to speak with the custody officer, the officer in charge of the suspects. A suspect also has the right to have a means of contacting another person outside of jail about the suspect’s arrest.
The probable cause requirement limits the power of the police to deprive people of liberty. Objective factual circumstances are required to establish probable cause and judges make the final determination. Probable cause is not established by saying something like, "I just had a hunch that the suspect was a carjacker." Even if it turns out the person is innocent, an arrest is valid if it is based on probable cause, protecting police against civil suits for false arrest.
Although the Fourth Amendment establishes the concept of probable cause, it is the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution which comes closest to defining "probable cause." This amendment simply speaks to the deprivation of liberty and rights without the due process of law. An actual definition of "probable cause" is impossible and judges interpret the meaning of probable cause on a case-by-case basis, taking into account:
Miranda Warning is a procedure that the police are required to follow if they wish to make a lawful interrogation. If the police arrest a suspect in order to interrogate the suspect, then a Miranda Warning must be given. If, however, the police arrest a suspect without making such an interrogation, then the Miranda Warning need not be given.
The legality of resisting an unlawful arrest varies from state to state. However, even if it is legal in the state the suspect is being arrested in, such resistance usually comes with additional restrictions. Also, while the act of resisting an arrest might be lawful, assaulting the arresting officer can be illegal and dangerous. It is usually more advisable to use the law to remedy injuries after the arrest has been cleared This is especially in the case of being arrested pursuant to a John Doe warrant, where it may be difficult to prove that the arrest was unlawful.
If you feel the police violated your rights and you want to file a lawsuit to collect money for your injuries, you should speak to a lawyer immediately to learn more about your rights and the complicated legal system.
Last Modified: 10-26-2016 10:48 AM PDTLaw Library Disclaimer
We've helped more than 4 million clients find the right lawyer – for free. Present your case online in minutes. LegalMatch matches you to pre-screened lawyers in your city or county based on the specifics of your case. Within 24 hours experienced local lawyers review it and evaluate if you have a solid case. If so, attorneys respond with an offer to represent you that includes a full attorney profile with details on their fee structure, background, and ratings by other LegalMatch users so you can decide if they're the right lawyer for you.