If a car hits you while you are jaywalking, you may be able to receive compensation if the driver was negligent or broke the law in some way. However, the driver will argue that you were at fault for not following the law. When both people are doing something wrong, the doctrines of negligence, contributory negligence, and comparative fault come into pla
Basically, negligence is the duty to act in a reasonable manner to avoid causing injuries to others. If a person fails to act reasonably, and through this failure, causes harm to the person or property of another, he or she has committed negligence. That person is then responsible for compensating the victim for whatever harm he or she caused.
In this case, the driver is going to argue, in his or her defense, the victim contributed or caused his or her own injuries by jaywalking. The theory is that nobody should be forced to pay for injuries that are actually the fault of the person who was injured.
There are two basic approaches to this defense: contributory negligence, and comparative fault. States differ on how they use each approach.
Under the contributory negligence theory, if the defense can show that the plaintiff was at all at fault, there is no liability, no matter how much at fault the defendant was.
Consider this example: a person is jaywalking (which is, in itself, careless behavior), and is hit by a car whose driver was speeding, talking on his phone, and reading the newspaper, and adjusting the radio at the same time. Most would agree that the driver is more to blame than the pedestrian, even though they are both at fault. However, under a theory of contributory negligence, the jaywalking pedestrian would not be able to recover any money.
More courts use a theory of comparative fault. Under this theory, the jury would be instructed to look at the relative degrees of fault and assign each party a percentage.
Using the same example above, suppose a jury finds that the driver was 80% at fault, and the jaywalking pedestrian was 20% at fault. The jaywalking pedestrian would then be able to recover 80% of his damages (medical expenses, pain and suffering, etc.). In such cases, it is up to the jury to decide exactly what percentage of fault each party bears, and modify their award accordingly. If the pedestrian was jaywalking, it is very unlikely that they would find that he or she bears none of the fault. The exact percentage of fault borne by each side would depend on the facts of each case.
Using either of these two defenses can get very complicated. However, these rules can determine your eligibility to recover a damages award. You should consult an experienced personal injury attorney to ensure that you recieve the compensation for your injuries that you deserve.
Last Modified: 10-08-2014 02:44 PM PDTLaw Library Disclaimer
We've helped more than 4 million clients find the right lawyer – for free. Present your case online in minutes. LegalMatch matches you to pre-screened lawyers in your city or county based on the specifics of your case. Within 24 hours experienced local lawyers review it and evaluate if you have a solid case. If so, attorneys respond with an offer to represent you that includes a full attorney profile with details on their fee structure, background, and ratings by other LegalMatch users so you can decide if they're the right lawyer for you.