Washington State Second Degree Manslaughter Law

Where You Need a Lawyer:

(This may not be the same place you live)

At No Cost! 

 How Does Washington State Define Manslaughter in the Second Degree?

In Washington State, manslaughter in the second degree is defined as the act of recklessly causing the death of another person. This means that the defendant acted in a way that was a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise in the same situation, which resulted in death, even if the defendant didn’t intend to kill. This can often involve situations where deaths result from negligent actions or omissions.

The “reasonable person standard” is pivotal when evaluating claims of second-degree manslaughter in Washington State. In this context, it serves to gauge whether the defendant’s actions were recklessly beyond what a hypothetical reasonable person would have done, thereby resulting in the unintended death of another individual.

Applying the Reasonable Person Standard in Washington State’s Second-Degree Manslaughter Context

In Washington, second-degree manslaughter hinges on the concept of recklessness. The reasonable person standard provides an objective lens through which the court assesses if the defendant’s actions were a “gross deviation” from what a reasonable person in the same situation would have done.

Rather than focusing on the defendant’s personal beliefs or experiences, the law in Washington would evaluate their actions against a hypothetical “reasonable person’s” behavior. This fictional individual embodies the community’s judgment of how a typical member should behave in given circumstances.

The actions deemed “reasonable” would change depending on the situation. For example, what might be considered reasonable behavior for someone handling a loaded firearm would differ from someone handling a toy gun, even if the outcome, tragically, is the same.

If a defendant in Washington possesses specific skills or knowledge, they might be held to a heightened standard compared to the average person. For instance, a medical professional who unintentionally causes death due to what would be perceived as a minor mistake by the general public might be seen as acting when evaluated against the standards of their profession.

Contextual Example for Washington State

Suppose someone in Washington State unintentionally causes death by leaving their child in a locked car on a hot day, believing it was cool enough outside and they’d only be away for a few minutes. In assessing a second-degree manslaughter charge, the court would weigh the defendant’s actions against what a reasonable person would have done in the same situation.

The law might determine that a reasonable person, aware of the potential risks of leaving a child in a car, would never leave a child unattended in such conditions, even for a short duration. If the defendant’s actions are found to be a gross deviation from this standard, they might be deemed reckless and found guilty of second-degree manslaughter.

How Is This Different from Manslaughter in the First Degree?

Manslaughter in the first degree in Washington State generally involves a higher degree of culpability than second-degree manslaughter. Specifically, it is when a person intentionally and unlawfully kills another without premeditation. The key distinction here is the element of “intention.” While both charges deal with unlawful killings, first-degree manslaughter requires the state to prove that the defendant had an intent to kill (without premeditation) or acted with extreme indifference to human life, whereas second-degree manslaughter involves recklessness that led to death.

Let’s illustrate the difference between first-degree and second-degree manslaughter in Washington State using two hypothetical scenarios.

Scenario 1: Manslaughter in the First Degree

Imagine that Alex and Blake have a heated argument in a park. Enraged, Alex grabs a rock and, with the specific intent of causing harm, throws it directly at Blake’s head. The impact is fatal, and Blake dies instantly.

Alex did not plan to kill Blake before they met in the park; the act was not premeditated. However, in the heat of the moment, Alex intentionally chose to throw the rock with the intent to harm, which resulted in Blake’s death. This action could be charged as manslaughter in the first degree because Alex had a clear intent to cause harm, even if there wasn’t premeditation to kill.

Scenario 2: Manslaughter in the Second Degree

Now, consider a different situation. Charlie and Dana are friends hiking together on a mountain trail. Wanting to show off, Charlie decides to dislodge a large stone and kick it down the slope, thinking it would be impressive to watch it tumble. Recklessly, Charlie doesn’t check if the path below is clear. Unfortunately, the stone hit Dana, who was a short distance below the trail, causing fatal injuries.

Charlie did not intend to harm Dana; the act was reckless without a direct intent to injure or kill. This could be charged as manslaughter in the second degree because Charlie’s recklessness led to Dana’s death, even though there wasn’t a direct intent to cause harm.

The key difference lies in the defendant’s state of mind. In the first scenario, there’s a clear intent to harm, leading to death, without premeditation. In the second scenario, the death results from a reckless action without specific intent to harm or kill.

Is Manslaughter in the Second Degree the Same Charge as Murder?

No, manslaughter in the second degree and murder in the second degree are distinct charges. While both involve the unlawful killing of another, murder in the second degree requires a different mental state. In Washington State, second-degree murder generally requires the act to be done with intent but without premeditation or, in some cases, when it’s done with malice.

Malice is the intent to cause bodily injury or the intent to engage in an act that poses a high risk of death. The key difference is the element of malice, which elevates the crime to murder rather than manslaughter.

Let’s use three hypothetical scenarios to illustrate the difference between manslaughter in the second degree, manslaughter in the first degree, and murder in the second degree in Washington State.

Scenario 1: Manslaughter in the Second Degree

Emma and Frank are hiking on a treacherous mountain trail. Wanting to capture a cool video for social media, Emma rolls a huge snowball down the slope without checking for any potential dangers. Recklessly, she doesn’t verify if the path below is clear. Tragically, the snowball hits Frank, causing him to lose his balance and die.

Emma did not intend to harm or kill Frank. Her actions were reckless but without any specific malintent. This could be charged as manslaughter in the second degree due to Emma’s recklessness.

Scenario 2: Manslaughter in the First Degree

Grace and Henry get into a fierce argument at a bar. In the heat of the moment, Grace throws her glass at Henry, aiming to hurt but not kill him. The glass hits him at a vulnerable spot, causing fatal injuries.

Grace did not premeditate killing Henry, but she intentionally acted to harm him, leading to his death. This could be charged as manslaughter in the first degree because Grace intended to harm, even without premeditation to kill.

Scenario 3: Murder in the Second Degree

For years, Isabelle and Jack have had ongoing disputes about a shared property line. One day, in anger, Isabelle decides she’s had enough. She waits by her window and, when she sees Jack standing near the disputed line, shoots at him with her rifle, intending to kill him. While she didn’t plan this action, her intent to cause Jack’s death is clear. Firing a rifle at someone is an act done with malice, as it demonstrates an intent to cause bodily injury or shows a disregard for the high risk of causing death.

In this scenario, Isabelle could be charged with murder in the second degree due to her malicious intent.

What Is the Penalty for Second-Degree Manslaughter?

In Washington State, manslaughter in the second degree is classified as a Class B felony. While penalties can vary depending on the specifics of the case, prior criminal history of the defendant, and other relevant factors, a Class B felony in Washington typically carries a maximum penalty of up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $20,000.

Should I Discuss My Manslaughter in the Second Degree Charge with a Lawyer?

Absolutely. If you or someone you know has been charged with manslaughter in the second degree, it is crucial to consult with a knowledgeable attorney as soon as possible. A Washington criminal lawyer will be able to evaluate the case details, provide guidance on potential defenses, and represent you in court.

If you’re searching for legal representation, LegalMatch can help connect you with a qualified Washington criminal lawyer who handles such cases.

Save Time and Money - Speak With a Lawyer Right Away

  • Buy one 30-minute consultation call or subscribe for unlimited calls
  • Subscription includes access to unlimited consultation calls at a reduced price
  • Receive quick expert feedback or review your DIY legal documents
  • Have peace of mind without a long wait or industry standard retainer
  • Get the right guidance - Schedule a call with a lawyer today!

16 people have successfully posted their cases

Find a Lawyer