A person can bring a suit for interference with contractual relations when a third party interrupts contract negotiations that would have resulted in a binding contract The law attempts to protect parties' contractual negotiations from outside disruption.
Although state laws may vary, intentional interference with contractual relations typically consider these issues:
The disruptor's knowledge is an important element of intentional interference with contractual relations. Thus, an actor who has no knowledge of the existence of a contract cannot be held liable when a breach results from his lawful acts. Furthermore, if the actor's purpose was not to interfere with contractual relations, he cannot be liable even if his actions have the unintended effect of discouraging one party from dealing contractually with the other. In other words, the actor must intend to cause the fallout in contractual relations.
Furthermore, the outsider must have no legitimate social or economic interest in the contractual relationship.
If you believe that someone has disrupted a contract relationship you are involved in you should probably speak to a lawyer. An experienced lawyer will inform you of your legal rights as well as preserve any possible legal remedies you may have. If you have been accused of intentionally disrupting contractual relations, you should speak to a lawyer immediately.
Last Modified: 07-06-2015 06:08 PM PDTLaw Library Disclaimer
We've helped more than 4 million clients find the right lawyer – for free. Present your case online in minutes. LegalMatch matches you to pre-screened lawyers in your city or county based on the specifics of your case. Within 24 hours experienced local lawyers review it and evaluate if you have a solid case. If so, attorneys respond with an offer to represent you that includes a full attorney profile with details on their fee structure, background, and ratings by other LegalMatch users so you can decide if they're the right lawyer for you.