Before AWCPA was passed, architectural works only received copyright protection as "graphic" or "pictorial" works. So while a person could not copy the blueprints of an architectural work, copying the building in which an architectural work was embodied was permissible.
Under AWCPA, however, the author of an architectural work has two copyrights in his work. The first copyright protects the architectural work in its graphic or pictorial form. The second copyright protects the intangible architectural work, regardless of whether it is embodied in a graphic work, such as a blueprint, or a non-graphic work, like the building itself.
AWPCA protections only apply to what the law terms "building." "Buildings" include structures that are habitable, like houses and office buildings, and structures that are used by humans, such as churches, pavilions, and gazebos. AWPCA specifically does not apply to architectural works like bridges, dams and highways.
If you have a problem regarding copyright protection for architectural works, speak with an intellectual property attorney with experience in copyright law. Copyright laws for architectural works are complex and getting expert help with your case is the best way to solve your copyright problem.
Last Modified: 01-06-2015 12:09 PM PSTLaw Library Disclaimer
We've helped more than 4 million clients find the right lawyer – for free. Present your case online in minutes. LegalMatch matches you to pre-screened lawyers in your city or county based on the specifics of your case. Within 24 hours experienced local lawyers review it and evaluate if you have a solid case. If so, attorneys respond with an offer to represent you that includes a full attorney profile with details on their fee structure, background, and ratings by other LegalMatch users so you can decide if they're the right lawyer for you.