In recent years, Airport Security has become a hot topic and issue of debate with both the government and the general public. At the heart of the controversy are privacy concerns, worries about unreasonable government intrusion, and racial profiling. The creation of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has further amplified the issue.
Most recently, certain airports have put to use millimeter wave scanners, more commonly known as "body scanners." These "advanced imaging technology scanners" were met with public outcry and have raised both privacy and Fourth Amendment concerns.
First of all, it has long been established that passengers have a Fourth Amendment privacy interest in their carry-on bags and luggage. However, administrative searches are allowed with little or no individualized probable cause that the person being searched is engaging in criminal behavior. An administrative search is a search done to further administrative goals, such as security, rather than to secure evidence of a crime.
These searches are typically allowed under the Fourth Amendment. Under this doctrine, for the search to be permissible, the government must establish the following:
Overall, the intrusion into the public’s privacy must not be unreasonable; this is determined by weighing the intrusiveness of the search against the government’s interests.
Yes. In 2011, a Federal Court of Appeals determined that full body scanners qualified as an administrative search. It is important to remember, however, that you are entitled to opt out of these scans and submit to a pat down search instead.
The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that the government shall not "make or enforce any law which shall deny to any person equal protection of the Laws." While there is no Equal Protection Clause in the Fifth Amendment, the Supreme Court has determined the principles and protections of Equal Protection apply to the federal government. The courts have identified the following as suspect classifications that trigger the most strict analysis:
Additionally, courts have determined that state action based on "alienage," or someone’s status as a non-citizen, will also receive strict scrutiny. However, since Congress has the inherent power to regulate immigration, any act by them, and therefore the federal government, that is focused on alienage will not receive this exacting level of review.
According to the FAA, the criteria used in profiling at the airport do not involve such suspect classifications.
In general, in order for a person's rights to have been violated, they must demonstrate that there was state action. However, courts have ruled that private airline employees are no different from public officials when conducting a search.
Profiling is inherently impossible to monitor by the public, legislative, or judicial authorities. Access to monitoring information that the public or Congress would need to engage in an informed debate about profiling has evaded review because it could be used by terrorists to evade being profiled. Therefore, as a practical matter, profiling may very well be occurring, but also may be a reality we are forced to live with.
The Fourth Amendment is notoriously complicated, particularly as it applies to airport luggage searches and racial profiling, and it is best to consult an attorney regarding the privacy rights that the Constitution demands. An experienced attorney will help you make the best argument possible regarding your Fourth Amendment rights.
Last Modified: 07-13-2016 10:03 AM PDTLaw Library Disclaimer
We've helped more than 4 million clients find the right lawyer – for free. Present your case online in minutes. LegalMatch matches you to pre-screened lawyers in your city or county based on the specifics of your case. Within 24 hours experienced local lawyers review it and evaluate if you have a solid case. If so, attorneys respond with an offer to represent you that includes a full attorney profile with details on their fee structure, background, and ratings by other LegalMatch users so you can decide if they're the right lawyer for you.