Accord and satisfaction is a compromise between a debtor and a creditor to release the debtor from the original debt obligation in exchange for a new payment. The new payment is usually less than the full amount owed and does not satisfy the original debt but is accepted instead of the original agreement. Rather than being treated as a separate contract, the new agreement is often viewed as a modification of the original contract.
If a new agreement is made to purchase a release, it discharges the original obligation. This means that the debtor no longer owes the original debt. However, the new agreement must have consideration to be a binding contract. This is usually satisfied by the execution of the new agreement, since the creditor and debtor are both receiving something of value, the freedom from the original debt and the present payment.
Since accord and satisfaction is an affirmative defense, the burden is on the debtor to establish that the obligation was discharged the the event that a creditor does attempt to enforce the original debt.
There are several reasons that a creditor might agree to the purchase of the debt for less, including:
Debt payment and collection can be a very confusing issue. A attorney can advise you of your rights and assist in creating an agreement for the payment of a debt. A lawyer can also represent you in court.
Last Modified: 07-08-2014 10:30 AM PDTLaw Library Disclaimer
We've helped more than 4 million clients find the right lawyer – for free. Present your case online in minutes. LegalMatch matches you to pre-screened lawyers in your city or county based on the specifics of your case. Within 24 hours experienced local lawyers review it and evaluate if you have a solid case. If so, attorneys respond with an offer to represent you that includes a full attorney profile with details on their fee structure, background, and ratings by other LegalMatch users so you can decide if they're the right lawyer for you.