The Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits the federal government from imposing excessive bail, excessive fines, or cruel and unusual punishments to criminal defendants who have been convicted of a crime. This means that the government cannot impose a penalty that is grossly disproportionate to the seriousness of the offense.
In a criminal case, a judge has discretion in prescribing legal punishments and penalties for defendants. However, there are several constitutional principles that protect defendants from excessively harsh or unusual punishments. Most of these limitations on criminal sentencing can be found in the 8th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
The 8th Amendment states that in a criminal case:
Supreme Court rulings have also held that criminal sentences that are barbarous, outrageous, inhumane, or that shock the social consciousness are unconstitutional.
There are also several state laws that protect criminal defendants by limiting sentences to those which are proportional to the crime committed. These protections may vary according to each state. However, the constitutional limitations mentioned above must be followed in every state.
The various sentencing provisions found in the 8th Amendment have greatly impacted the way that judges can issue a sentence. For example, the Cruel and Unusual Punishment clause has been the subject of much debate and litigation. The limitations on cruel and unusual punishment require that criminal sentences be in proportion to the severity of the crime committed. Criminal punishments that are disproportionate to the crime will likely be overturned on appeal.
The types of penalties that have been an issue during the sentencing stage are:
Practically speaking, it can sometimes be more expensive to appeal a fine than to simply pay the fine itself. However, if the defendant can prove the elements mentioned above, then they can probably have the fine overturned based on the Excessive Fines clause.
Under certain circumstances, an unfair criminal sentence can sometimes be appealed. Criminal defendants have the right to appeal their case based on a legal or procedural matter. With regards to an unfair or unconstitutional sentence, a defendant will likely be more successful on appeal if they can provide a solid basis of proof.
For example, defendant might have success on appeal if they can prove that the sentence was the result of the wrong law being applied, or if it was the result of insufficient evidence. A retrial may be available if the original trial contained more serious errors, such as attorney misconduct or a hung jury.
In any criminal case, the defendant always has the right to an attorney. You should speak with a criminal lawyer if you believe that a criminal sentence was unconstitutional in any way. Your lawyer can assist you in filing for an appeal, and will be able to provide further representation during court hearings.
Last Modified: 07-09-2015 09:54 AM PDTLaw Library Disclaimer
We've helped more than 4 million clients find the right lawyer – for free. Present your case online in minutes. LegalMatch matches you to pre-screened lawyers in your city or county based on the specifics of your case. Within 24 hours experienced local lawyers review it and evaluate if you have a solid case. If so, attorneys respond with an offer to represent you that includes a full attorney profile with details on their fee structure, background, and ratings by other LegalMatch users so you can decide if they're the right lawyer for you.