In many cases of “social” recreational drug use, the person who bought the drugs will sometimes share them with friends or visitors. There have been some questions as to whether or not this can be treated as drug distribution, which is a far more severe crime than mere drug possession.
Many people assume that, because no money changes hands when drugs are shared, the law will not treat it as drug distribution. This is not always the case.
The federal statute which prohibits drug distribution does not say anything about social versus commercial distribution. The majority of federal courts which have considered the issue have found that there is no distinction. People who share drugs with friends can be found guilty of drug distribution.
Under the meaning of the law, the word “distribute” simply means “to deliver.” There is no requirement that the drugs be sold, only that they change hands. Accordingly, if somebody hosts a party, and shares drugs with the guests, that person could be charged with drug distribution.
Similarly, if a person is arrested with drugs on his or her person, and a court finds that he planned to give some of the drugs to his or her friends, without being paid, he may be guilty of drug possession with intent to distribute, which is a more severe crime.
Last Modified: 03-10-2014 10:50 AM PDTLaw Library Disclaimer
We've helped more than 4 million clients find the right lawyer – for free. Present your case online in minutes. LegalMatch matches you to pre-screened lawyers in your city or county based on the specifics of your case. Within 24 hours experienced local lawyers review it and evaluate if you have a solid case. If so, attorneys respond with an offer to represent you that includes a full attorney profile with details on their fee structure, background, and ratings by other LegalMatch users so you can decide if they're the right lawyer for you.