In Texas, auto dealers may face legal responsibility if they provide misleading or inaccurate information during the sale of a vehicle. This includes failing to disclose important facts about the car or providing false details that could influence a buyer’s decision.
The primary legal framework that protects consumers in this scenario is the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”), which is outlined in Texas Business & Commerce Code Section 17.41 and the following sections.
Under this law, a dealer may be held accountable for engaging in deceptive actions, such as misrepresenting a vehicle’s condition, features, or past damage. Buyers harmed by such conduct may seek compensation for their losses, legal fees, and even additional damages if the misrepresentation was intentional.
Beyond statutory protections, common law fraud applies when a dealer knowingly gives false information with the intent to mislead. In order to succeed in a fraud claim, the buyer must show that the false statement was deliberate, they relied on it, and suffered harm as a result.
It is important to note that Texas law also allows claims for negligent misrepresentation. Negligent misrepresentation claims may arise when a dealer shares inaccurate information without verifying its truthfulness. Even if the misstatement wasn’t intentional, the dealer could still be liable if the buyer reasonably relied on it and was negatively affected.
What Are Some Common Car Dealer Lies in Texas?
As mentioned above, in Texas, certain dishonest practices by car dealerships may violate consumer protection laws and could give rise to legal claims. Examples of common car dealer lies and misrepresentations include:
- Tampering with the odometer to falsely lower the recorded mileage
- Misleading advertisements, including listing features the car doesn’t actually have or hiding undisclosed costs
- Withholding key information, such as previous accident history, salvage title status, or existing mechanical issues
- Bait-and-switch schemes, where customers are lured by one vehicle but urged to buy a different one
- Yo-yo financing tactics, in which financing is first approved and later revoked, forcing buyers into less favorable loan terms
Depending on the situation, all of the above misrepresentations may be categorized as fraudulent, if they were done knowingly. They may also be categorized as negligent, if made without proper verification.
Buyers harmed by such conduct may file legal claims under the DTPA to recover losses, legal costs, and in some cases, enhanced damages when the deception was intentional. Additionally, complaints against licensed dealers may also be submitted to the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles or the State Attorney General’s Office, both of which oversee compliance and investigate misconduct.
What Are the Types of Auto Dealer Misrepresentation Claims in Texas?
In Texas, legal claims against auto dealerships for misrepresentation typically fall under one of three key types of misrepresentation claims: intentional misrepresentation (i.e., fraudulent misrepresentation), negligent misrepresentation, and statutory consumer protection violations.
Intentional misrepresentation occurs when a dealer knowingly provides false information to mislead a buyer. Under Texas Business & Commerce Code Section 27.01, which addresses fraud in transactions involving real or personal property, a buyer may pursue legal action if they can show the dealer made a false claim about an important fact, knew the claim was untrue, expected the buyer to rely on it, and that the buyer experienced harm due to that reliance.
On the other hand, negligent misrepresentation doesn’t require intent to deceive. Instead, it applies when a dealer shares inaccurate details without properly checking their accuracy. This legal concept is recognized through Texas case law and requires the buyer to prove that the dealer failed to exercise reasonable care when providing information, and that the buyer acted on it to their detriment.
The third type of misrepresentation claim involves the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, codified at Texas Business & Commerce Code Section 17.41. This statute makes it unlawful for sellers, including car dealers, to engage in deceptive conduct in consumer transactions. Buyers may seek damages, reimbursement for legal costs, and even enhanced financial penalties if the misrepresentation was deliberate.
Additionally, if a contract was entered into based on a false fact or misrepresentation, then the consumer may be able to undergo contract rescission and even obtain contract damages based on the fraud or misrepresentation. If you should have any questions regarding fraudulent contract inducement, Texas lawyers experienced in contract law can answer any questions you may have.
What Is Fraudulent Misrepresentation Under Texas Law?
As noted above, fraudulent misrepresentation in Texas refers to a knowingly false statement made with the intent to mislead another party, causing them to rely on that statement and suffer harm as a result. This legal concept is recognized under both common law and statutory provisions, including Texas Business & Commerce Code Section 27.01, which governs fraud in property and stock transactions.
In order to succeed in a fraudulent misrepresentation claim, the plaintiff must show:
- There was a false statement about a material fact
- The defendant knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for its truth
- The statement was made with the intent to induce reliance
- The plaintiff justifiably relied on the misrepresentation
- That reliance led to actual and quantifiable damages
It is important to note that Texas courts also consider silence or partial disclosure as fraudulent if there’s a duty to speak, such as in fiduciary relationships or when omitting facts creates a misleading impression.
For example, in the Texas Supreme Court case Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers & Contractors, Inc., the Texas Supreme Court held that a promise made with no intent to perform can qualify as fraud.
How To Sue a Car Dealer for Fraudulent or Negligent Misrepresentation in Texas
If you believe that a car dealer in Texas misled you, either through intentional deception or careless misstatements, then you may have legal options to pursue compensation. Whether the misrepresentation involved the vehicle’s history, financing terms, or its features, Texas law offers multiple remedies through both the courts and regulatory agencies.
The following is a general overview of the steps involved in taking legal action against a car dealer:
- First, you need to collect all relevant documentation, including contracts, advertisements, written or verbal communications, vehicle reports, and repair records
- Next, you should always first attempt to resolve the dispute directly with the dealership to potentially avoid litigation
- If you are unable to resolve the dispute, you can then submit complaints to agencies such as the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles, the Texas Attorney General’s Office, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), or the Better Business Bureau (“BBB”)
- If administrative action fails, it is recommended to then speak with a qualified attorney, particularly one who focuses on consumer protection or auto fraud, in order to determine whether to pursue claims under common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, or the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act
- You can then file suit in the appropriate court, which could be small claims court for lower-value disputes or civil district court for larger cases
- You will then likely engage in the legal discovery process and prepare for possible settlement talks or mediation
- Finally, you will then proceed to trial if the matter cannot be resolved through negotiation, presenting evidence to establish liability and damages
What Is Negligent Misrepresentation Under Texas Law?
As mentioned above, negligent misrepresentation is a type of misrepresentation that occurs when a party provides false information in a business or financial transaction without exercising reasonable care to ensure its accuracy, and another party relies on that misinformation to their detriment.
Unlike fraud, this claim does not require proof of intent to deceive, instead it only requires that the defendant failed to use proper diligence in communicating facts. In order for a plaintiff (i.e., the person that was allegedly harmed) to succeed on a negligent misrepresentation claim, they must prove:
- That the defendant made a representation in the course of their business or in a transaction with a financial interest
- The defendant provided false information for the guidance of others
- The defendant failed to exercise reasonable care or competence in obtaining or communicating the information
- The plaintiff justifiably relied on the representation
- The plaintiff suffered financial loss as a result
LegalMatch can assist you in locating and setting up a legal consultation in Texas with a fraud lawyer who handles cases that are similar to yours.
Should I Consult a Texas Auto Fraud Attorney?
If you have been harmed as a result of car dealer misrepresentation, then it is recommended to immediately consult with an experienced Texas auto fraud lawyer. LegalMatch can connect you with the right lawyer for your case.
Having an experienced lawyer will greatly increase your likelihood of resolving your claim in a favorable manner. An attorney will be able to inform you of your best course of legal action and be there to guide you throughout the matter.
If administrative actions or negotiations do not resolve your claims, then they can also file a civil lawsuit on your behalf. They can then help you gather the evidence necessary to meet your burden and prove your claim. Finally, they can also represent you in court, as needed.
