A contract is considered to be ambiguous if the contract is reasonably subject to more than one interpretation. Sometimes, this can mean that it’s unclear as to what the parties intended overall. But usually, an ambiguous contract means that a specific term, word, phrase, or definition is vague or unclear.
If a contract is ambiguous, it can sometimes be resolved by the parties through further discussions. If not, it may be necessary to have the document reviewed in court to have the issues resolved.
A common type of ambiguous contract is where the definition of a word is not clearly defined in the contract. For example, a contract may have referenced a dollar amount for a Canadian insurance contract. The word “dollar” might be ambiguous here, since it might mean either U.S. dollars or Canadian dollars.
A court might find that the term meant Canadian dollars if the parties were both from Canada and had a history of using Canadian dollars to measure insurance limits. So, a court can use a wide range of facts from the circumstances surrounding the contract.
Usually, if there is no evidence of fraud or misrepresentation between the parties, a court will allow the parties to rewrite the contract in order to resolve the ambiguity. When engaging in contract interpretation, a court might use the following to help them understand the parties’ intentions:
Also, in most jurisdictions, ambiguous contracts are said to be resolved “against” the party that drafted the contract. The party that did not write the contract will sometimes receive the benefit of the doubt regarding ambiguities. This is because it is assumed that the party that drafted the contract may have more knowledge and bargaining power compared with the other.
Finally, courts may sometimes avoid resolving ambiguous contracts in ways that would lead to unnecessary hardship for one of the parties. This is common where one party has significantly more experience or bargaining leverage than the other.
Parties to a contract always want to draft a contract in a way to prevent future disagreements.Here are some ways to to avoid ambiguities in a contract:
The parol evidence rule states that once the parties have entered into a contract and the contract is full and complete expression of the parties agreement, no outside oral or written agreements may be introduced to add, change, or contradict the terms of the contract. However, if language in the contract is ambiguous and unclear, the parol evidence allows parties to bring is outside evidence only to resolve the ambiguous language and explain the parties intention.
Remember, that if ambiguity arise after the contract is entered into, the parol evidence rule may only be used to interpret the language and explain that parties actual intentions, but can never add, contradict, or change any terms of the original contract agreement.
Because there are many different factors that go into a contract, even well-written contracts can sometimes contain ambiguous terms. If you need assistance with an ambiguous contract, a business lawyer can help you resolve the issues. Many issues involving ambiguous contract can be avoided by working with a lawyer prior to the drafting and negotiating stages. An experienced attorney in your area can also represent you in court if a lawsuit arises due to a breach of contract.
Last Modified: 01-28-2015 01:51 PM PSTLaw Library Disclaimer
We've helped more than 4 million clients find the right lawyer – for free. Present your case online in minutes. LegalMatch matches you to pre-screened lawyers in your city or county based on the specifics of your case. Within 24 hours experienced local lawyers review it and evaluate if you have a solid case. If so, attorneys respond with an offer to represent you that includes a full attorney profile with details on their fee structure, background, and ratings by other LegalMatch users so you can decide if they're the right lawyer for you.