An individual can confirm that they have grounds to file a lawsuit in California by having a lawyer consultation in California with a California lawyer. An individual may have grounds for a lawsuit for any number of reasons. They may have been a party to a contract that the other party has breached by failing to do what they promised in the agreement. They may have been injured in an auto accident. They may be in a dispute with their partners in business.
An individual needs to consult a lawyer and have them review the facts of their situation in order to know if they have a lawsuit. One thing the lawyer would initially do is to tell a person whether they have cause to file a lawsuit. They could then engage in an analysis to determine who would be named as defendants in the lawsuit.
A lawyer needs to analyze which laws might apply to a particular dispute and what kind of remedy the law offers their client, who would become the plaintiff in a lawsuit. They could compare and contrast the remedy that their client needs and the remedies that the applicable law could provide.
Another important issue for a lawyer and their client to consider would be the economics of filing a lawsuit. Lawsuits are expensive, in part because a party to a lawsuit would have to pay a lawyer to represent them, unless the case is one in which a party could represent themselves in a California small claims court.
If an individual or entity would not be able to represent themselves in their lawsuit, then the expense of pursuing a lawsuit has to be compared to the potential value of any possible remedy that they might recover.
A lawyer would be able to determine whether the applicable law allows a plaintiff to recover their attorney’s fees if they should win their case. Certain laws do provide that a successful plaintiff may recover their attorney’s fees as part of their recovery if their lawsuit is successful.
These are some of the considerations that would determine whether an individual or an entity, e.g., a business, has grounds for a lawsuit in California.
Of course, another situation in which a person might have a lawsuit in California is if they have been named as a defendant in a lawsuit brought by another individual or entity, i.e. if they have been sued.
A person would know if they have been sued if they are served with a complaint. Being served entails being approached by a person known as a “process server” who hands them a complaint, which is the technical, legal document that begins a civil lawsuit.
If a person has been served, they have 30 days to file their response and they should take the complaint to a lawyer in California as soon as possible to get the lawyer’s guidance regarding the response they should make.
Do You Have a Viable Lawsuit Under California Law?
Again, whether an individual has a viable lawsuit is something that they would determine in consultation with their lawyer. A viable lawsuit would require a set of facts that are likely to require the individual or entity sued to provide a legal remedy to the individual who sues them.
An individual or entity who thinks that they want to sue some other person or entity would also have to consider a number of additional factors before going forward. They want to know whom they should sue. Who is legally responsible for answering in court for the harm done to them? They need to consider where any potential defendant is located and where they would have to be sued.
A person or entity contemplating a lawsuit needs to consider whether the entity who is responsible for the harm done to them would be able to pay any award of damages that the person might win in a lawsuit. If the person or entity they sue would not be able to pay, there might be little point in pursuing an expensive lawsuit against them. These and other factors have to be considered.
How to file a lawsuit in California, if it does appear viable, is something an individual can ask a California lawyer.
How Long Do You Have to Sue Someone in California?
An individual has as much time as the law gives them to sue another person or entity in California. Laws called “statutes of limitations” determine how much time someone has. Statutes of limitation specify the amount of time an individual or entity has to initiate a certain type of lawsuit. There are different statutes of limitations for different types of lawsuits.
For example, the statute of limitations in California for a lawsuit alleging negligence is 2 years from the date when the victim suffered injury. Four years from the date a contract is breached is the statute of limitations for breach of a written contract; it is 2 years from the date of the breach for an oral contract. Three years from the date the damage was inflicted on property is the statute of limitations for damage to property.
Again, a person who thinks they may have cause to sue someone may want to consult a lawyer in California about the statute of limitations that would apply in their case.
What Is an Impending Lawsuit in California?
An impending lawsuit is a lawsuit that some individual or entity is considering filing or that they plan to file in a court in California.
Find My Lawyer Now!
Are There Alternatives To Filing a Lawsuit in California?
Alternative dispute resolution processes for resolving conflicts are available in California. Informal negotiation is one time-honored way of resolving disputes that is often used and often successful. If one party has filed a lawsuit, then all parties to the lawsuit, themselves or through their attorneys, often negotiate and identify their own resolution to the case. They may do this even before a lawsuit is filed.
Courts often sponsor settlement conferences involving a judge and the parties to a lawsuit, in order to promote resolution of the dispute without having a trial.
Courts often also offer parties mediation as a way to resolve their conflict. In mediation, the parties meet with a neutral mediator who works to help the parties identify a solution to their conflict that is acceptable to them. Again, courts often offer mediation to the parties to a lawsuit, and there is no charge for the service.
Parties might also enlist a private mediator whom they pay themselves who performs the mediation, meeting with the parties and working with them to identify a resolution that works for them.
Many companies require people who have a complaint against them to agree to use arbitration and not to file lawsuits in court. For example, the law in California allows employers to demand that a prospective employee sign an arbitration agreement. Some employers probably would not hire a person who refuses to agree to arbitrate disputes rather than turning to a court of law.
In an arbitration agreement, the parties agree to waive the right they have under civil law in the U.S. to file a lawsuit in a court of law to seek remedies allowed to them by the law regarding civil wrongs.
In an arbitration, there is a private arbitrator who acts much like a judge in a trial in a court of law. The arbitrator supposedly applies the same law that a judge would apply in a court of law. The parties present their cases much as they would in a trial. The arbitrator issues a decision that is binding on the parties.
Employers and other businesses tend to prefer arbitration, because they feel that arbitrators might be more favorable to their interests. Arbitration is arguably more efficient and may be less expensive than a trial in a court of law. Of course, a court of law might give the respective rights of all parties more serious and fair consideration than an arbitrator does. But this is not certain. Of course, most arbitrators are fair and objective.
In California, a party who is not satisfied with an arbitrator’s decision can challenge it in two ways. One way is to appeal to the arbitrator who renders the decision. Another way is to appeal to go to the Arbitration Appellate Board (AAB).
In an arbitration that is referred to as “binding arbitration,” the parties simply do not have the right to appeal an arbitrator’s decision, even if it is clearly in error and not supported by either the evidence or the law. The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and its California counterpart, the California Arbitration Act (CAA), offer only limited grounds for review by a court of an arbitrator’s decision in a binding arbitration.
The CAA limits a court’s ability to confirm, vacate, or correct an arbitration award. Parties who do want to pursue the correction of an arbitrator’s decision must petition a California superior court no sooner than 10 days and no later than 100 days after the arbitration decision is issued.
Do I Need a California Lawyer?
Do you have a lawsuit in California? Do you need a lawyer? These are questions that you may well want to discuss with a lawyer in California. LegalMatch.com can connect you to a lawyer who can help you figure out if you have grounds to file a lawsuit and the other issues you must consider as you decide how to seek resolution of your conflict.
If you have been sued, you want to connect to a lawyer in California as soon as possible because you have only a limited amount of time to respond.
