A doctor is required to disclose all relevant information regarding your medical treatment in order to allow you to make a decision about your own treatment. If a doctor fails to disclose pertinent information, he may be liable for medical malpractice.
The doctor's duty to disclose includes:
Typically, a doctor is held to the standard of care of a "reasonable doctor". Thus, a doctor need only disclose that which a "reasonable doctor" would disclose. Although voodoo may be a form of alternative treatment, if a reasonable doctor would not tell a patient of that option, a doctor does not have a duty to disclose it.
To bring a successful suit against a doctor, you must prove not only that he failed to disclose some pertinent information, but also that you suffered some injury as a consequence of that failure.
Generally, it is often wise to disclose that malpractice occurred if malpractice did in fact occur. The failure to disclose medical malpractice is often treated as medical malpractice. If the patient was injured by a doctor, then the doctor has a duty to inform the patient about the condition such that the patient can make a decision to receive adequate care.
With that said, a doctor who wishes to avoid a costly lawsuit over the malpractice may wish to avoid using exact legal terms when disclosing the information to the patient. In other words, the doctor need not tell the patient that the doctor’s conduct was so far below the standard of care that a lawsuit against the doctor would be possible. The doctor does, however, have an obligation to inform the patient that a surgical procedure went astray. Such information can help the patient immensely.
In the last few years, some patients have begun asking not to know about their conditions. These patients often feel they are not prepared to make the necessary choices such knowledge would force the patients to make. However, these conditions are often fatal and the patients would likely perish without treatment.
For doctors, this is a difficult dilemma. The doctors have the expertise and skills to treat the patient, yet the doctors cannot treat the patient without the patient’s consent. From a legal standpoint, though, it is possible to create a waiver removing all liable from the doctor if the patient wishes not to be informed of the medical condition which afflicts the patient.
Doctors sometimes have the obligation to disclose a patient’s medical information to third parties, despite the privileged communication between doctor and patient. These situations include, but are not limited to:
A skilled medical malpractice lawyer can evaluate your case and, if necessary, represent you in court.
Last Modified: 11-03-2017 12:01 AM PDTLaw Library Disclaimer
We've helped more than 4 million clients find the right lawyer – for free. Present your case online in minutes. LegalMatch matches you to pre-screened lawyers in your city or county based on the specifics of your case. Within 24 hours experienced local lawyers review it and evaluate if you have a solid case. If so, attorneys respond with an offer to represent you that includes a full attorney profile with details on their fee structure, background, and ratings by other LegalMatch users so you can decide if they're the right lawyer for you.