Over the last several years, there have been widespread media reports of sexual abuse of children by clergy in churches they attended. While the focus has been primarily on the Catholic Church, it is not the only church whose clergy have been accused of abuse.
The problem worsened when information surfaced indicating that many churches had attempted to conceal the existence and extent of the child abuse.
Many victims have pressed for criminal charges against their abusers, and filed civil lawsuits against the organizations that allegedly concealed the abuse.
How Do the Abuse Victims Succeed In a Clergy Sex Abuse Lawsuit?
To prevail in such a case, an abuse victim would probably have to prove only that he or she was sexually abused, and that the church took inadequate steps to address the issue, or took some affirmative steps to cover it up. It would also be possible to sue the perpetrator individually, though that person is not likely to have the financial resources to cover any judgment or settlement.
The vast majority of lawsuits related to clergy sex abuse have ended in settlement. These cases often involve multiple victims, contributing to the huge settlements. The Society of Jesus recently settled a case in Alaska for $50 million. It was claimed that members of the church sexually abused over 100 Inuit children at a mission in Alaska.
The Archdiocese of Boston has been embroiled in legal action concerning its cover-ups of abuse, and may settle for close to $100 million. Many other churches and diocese in the U.S. have filed for bankruptcy after being sued for clergy abuse.
What Difficulties Are There In Bringing a Clergy Sex Abuse Lawsuit?
Clergy sex abuse suits have become more common, but there are still significant hurdles to be addressed. The first is that many churches will invoke Constitutional law and the freedom of religion clause to hide their misdeeds. Although many judges have ruled that the judiciary is capable of rendering a verdict on criminal matters without touching church doctrine, many clergy will still use the First Amendment as a shield against any state scrutiny.
Another major obstacle to clergy sex abuse cases is that many of these cases involve victims who were once minors. Since children are reluctant to speak up when an adult is abusing them and with the churches often working to cover up any hint of scandal, the crimes often took place years, maybe decades, before any lawsuit can be brought forth. As a result, the statute of limitations, a time limit on when lawsuits can be filed with courts, has often long expired. It is crucial that any sort of abuse be heard by a judge as quickly as possible, or if the statutes of limitations have lapsed, to persuade a judge to hear such a case.
How Does Clergy Sex Abuse Differ from Clergy Malpractice?
Although clergy sex abuse is clergy malpractice, sex abuse is obviously a more serious subset of the latter. Sexual abuse of anyone, but especially children who place their trust in an authority figure, is a serious crime. Malpractice typically represents negligence, a failure to take certain actions to prevent a disastrous outcome. Abusing minors and then concealing evidence of such behavior is not a failure to take action, but an action which never should have been committed in the first place. Since clergy sex abuse deals with an aspect of criminal law, judges are now willing to hear such cases, while clergy malpractice suits are more likely to be bogged down in legal technicalities.
Do I Need a Lawyer For My Clergy Sex Abuse Lawsuit?
Victims of abuse by members of the clergy may be able to bring criminal charges, as well as a civil suit for damages. Since lawsuits against the clergy are a new and changing field of law, it is helpful to consult with an experienced criminal attorney to assure the best possible representation and outcome.