Digg!  
Digg! Bookmark Page
Search the Library:
Powered by Google™
Present Your Case How It Works
Arrow Find the Right Antitrust Cases Lawyers now: Click Here to Present Your Case

Antitrust Cases Lawyers

 
Legal Topics > Business > Unfair Competition > Antitrust and Trade Regulation

Microsoft Corporation vs. Ashcroft

The Department of Justice (DOJ) and 20 states brought an antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft Corporation in 1998. The DOJ claimed Microsoft violated antitrust laws by selling its web software, Internet Explorer, with its Windows operating system. This made it very hard for other companies to sell their web browser software. Microsoft argued that Internet Explorer and Windows were essentially the same program and should be sold together.

The next year, the judge in the case found that Microsoft constituted a monopoly in the computer operating systems market. He further stated that the company was using its monopoly power to prevent technological innovation, and that this harmed consumers. Although the judge ruled that Microsoft would be divided into two parts, this was overturned on appeal.

In 2001, the DOJ said it would not try to break the company up, but rather use more lenient antitrust penalties. The DOJ demanded that Microsoft share part of its operating system technology with other software companies. Microsoft accepted the settlement in 2002, however, a number of the states that had joined the lawsuit felt that it was not a harsh enough punishment for the company¿s antitrust practices.

United States vs. Oracle Corporation

In February 2004, the DOJ filed an antitrust lawsuit against the software firm, Oracle. The suit was filed after Oracle¿s hostile bid to buy over a competing software firm, PeopleSoft. The DOJ stated that if Oracle successful bought PeopleSoft, it would greatly restrict competition in the development of software for human resources management and financial management services. Final arguments in the case were given in July 2004.

F. Hoffman-LaRoche, Ltd. vs. Empragan

The Supreme Court recently limited the extent to which companies can be liable for anti-trust violations in other countries. The Court held that the Sherman Act, one of the major federal antitrust laws, does not allow foreign buyers to bring antitrust lawsuits in the U.S. for violations that happened in a foreign country.

Consult a Lawyer - Click Here to Present Your Case Now!
 
Related Articles:
•  California's Unfair Competition Act Lawyers
•  Visa and Mastercard Antitrust Litigation
•  Price-Fixing Lawyers
•  California Unfair Practices Act Lawyers
•  Penalties for Violating Antitrust Laws
•  Sherman Anti-Trust Act Lawyers
•  Antitrust Lawsuits
•  Clayton Act Lawyers
•  Antitrust Laws
•  Federal Trade Commission Act
•  Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act Lawyers
•  Antitrust Lawyers
•  Antitrust Tying Arrangement Lawyers
•  The Archer Daniels Midland Antitrust Suit
•  Robinson-Patman Act Lawyers
•  Cartwright Act Lawyers
•  Department of Justice Antitrust Suit against Microsoft
Related Forums:
•  Business Law Forum
Related Blogs:
•  Business Law Blog
Arrow Find the Right Antitrust Cases Lawyers now: Click Here to Present Your Case
Did you find this article informative?
 Bookmark Icon Bookmark it or share it on
  del.icio.us or Digg
LegalMatch: The Benchmark for Attorney / Client Matching Services
  TRUSTe: click to view the LegalMatch privacy policy   HACKER SAFE certified sites prevent over 99.9% of hacker crime.   Better Business Bureau Online Reliability Seal
Copyright 1999- LegalMatch. All rights reserved. LegalMatch®, the LegalMatch logo, and the tradedress are trademarks of LegalMatch. Patents Pending.



User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Site Map