Out of Court Bankruptcy Settlement Lawyers
The complexity of bankruptcy proceedings has made finding alternatives to filing for bankruptcy both more appealing and more challenging. One of the primary ways to resolve debt issues outside of the formal bankruptcy process is to pursue an out of court settlement.
What is an Out of Court Settlement?
An out of court settlement is a privately conducted negotiation between each debtor and creditor. The rules of the settlement are governed by the basic principles of contract law.
There are three primary types of out of court settlements:
- Assignment for benefit of creditors: transfer by debtor of title and control of all or part of revenue producing property to a third party chosen by the creditor to administer or sell the property and distribute the proceeds
- Receiverships: assignment as appointed by the Court
- Extension and composition plans: compromise contract proposed by the debtor for creditors to extend time until payment is due and/or reduction in amount due.
When Should I Consider an Out Of Court Settlement?
An out of court settlement can be attempted in any circumstance; however it is most likely to be successful if:
- There are only a few creditors, all of whom are reasonably sophisticated.
- The creditor committee overseeing the disposition of property and disbursement of proceeds is active and involved.
- The debtor is an "integral economic force" whose continued involvement in the community is economically desirable.
An out of court settlement is basically a novation - a replacement of one arrangement for another; therefore it is critical that every creditor is represented and participates in the settlement effort. Otherwise, you run the risk of facing subsequent challenges to the agreement by unrepresented creditors.
Are There Any Risks in Pursuing An Out of Court Settlement?
The primary risk in pursuing an out of court settlement lies with the debtor. An out of court settlement will require negotiations that include full financial disclosure through regular accounting of all assets. A major concern for debtors is the risk that an overzealous or unethical creditor may take advantage of the negotiation process to discover and seize assets and refuse to conclude an actual settlement.
Additionally, if the settlement attempt fails, then the debtor will have to proceed with bankruptcy proceedings after having incurred the expense of out of court negotiations.
Do I Need a Bankruptcy Attorney?
An experienced bankruptcy attorney can reduce these risks and protect the debtor¿s interests whether the settlement effort is successful or not by preparing all documents in accordance with the requirements for bankruptcy proceedings. This will save time and money in case it becomes necessary to file for bankruptcy. The attorney can also take measures to protect the debtor from the risk that disclosed property will be seized as a result of the negotiation process.
Consult a Lawyer - Present Your Case Now!
Last Modified: 10-14-2010 12:17 PM PDT
