Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress in an Assault Case

Where You Need a Lawyer:

(This may not be the same place you live)

At No Cost! 

 What Is Emotional Distress?

Emotional distress is a type of harm that a person may experience following a traumatic or highly stressful event. Unlike physical injuries, which can be easily seen and measured, emotional distress refers to the psychological impact that an event has on an individual.

This impact can manifest in several ways, such as anxiety, depression, insomnia, or even physical symptoms caused by stress. It’s important to recognize that emotional distress is a real and significant form of suffering, and its effects can be just as debilitating as physical injuries.

What Is Civil Assault?

Civil assault is a legal term used to describe a situation where one person acts in a way that causes another person to fear imminent harm. It’s important to distinguish civil assault from criminal assault. In a civil assault case, the focus is on the victim’s fear and apprehension of harm rather than on physical contact. This is a key aspect because even if there is no actual physical harm, the fear and apprehension alone can constitute a civil assault.

What Is Negligent Infliction Of Emotional Distress?

Negligent infliction of emotional distress occurs when someone suffers emotional harm due to another person’s negligent actions. Negligence, in this context, means that the person who caused the harm failed to act as a reasonable person would have under similar circumstances. This concept is important because it acknowledges that emotional harm can be just as real and damaging as physical harm.

For example, a bystander may suffer emotional distress after witnessing a traumatic event caused by someone’s negligence.

How Can I Prove Negligent Infliction Of Emotional Distress?

Proving negligent infliction of emotional distress can be challenging, as emotional harm is less tangible than physical harm. However, there are specific elements of negligent infliction of emotional distress that must be proven:

Duty of Care

Establishing a duty of care is the first step in the context of negligent infliction of emotional distress. This legal concept involves proving that the defendant had a responsibility to act in a manner that would prevent harm to others. For example, drivers on the road have a duty to drive safely to avoid accidents, and business owners are expected to maintain safe environments for their customers.

The specific nature of this duty varies depending on the circumstances of each case, but the underlying principle is that the defendant was expected to act (or refrain from acting) in a way that would not cause harm to others, including emotional distress.

Breach of Duty

Once a duty of care is established, the next element to prove is the breach of that duty by the defendant. This breach can occur through specific actions taken by the defendant or through their failure to act when action was required. In both cases, the breach must be a deviation from what a reasonably prudent person would do in similar circumstances.

For instance, in the case of a car accident, a driver who was texting while driving would have breached their duty of care. In a business setting, if a known hazard is not addressed and leads to an incident, this could constitute a breach of duty. Demonstrating this breach requires showing that the defendant’s conduct fell below the standard of care expected in the situation.

Causation

Causation is about linking the defendant’s breach of duty directly to the emotional distress suffered. This means proving that the emotional distress would not have occurred if not for the defendant’s negligent actions.

This connection is vital and often the most challenging part to establish, as it involves demonstrating a clear cause-and-effect relationship between the defendant’s negligence and the emotional harm sustained. It’s not enough for the emotional distress to occur after the defendant’s actions; it must be shown that the distress was a direct result of those actions.

Damages

The final element is proving the actual damages suffered due to the emotional distress. This involves quantifying the emotional harm in a way that can be compensated. Damages can include the cost of medical bills for psychological treatment, such as therapy sessions and any medication required.

Additionally, damages may cover other aspects like pain and suffering, which encompass the broader impacts on the victim’s life, such as anxiety, depression, loss of enjoyment of life, and other emotional and psychological effects. Evidence for these damages often includes testimony from mental health professionals, personal accounts of the victim’s suffering, and documentation of any treatment received for the emotional distress.

What Is The Zone Of Danger?

The “zone of danger” is a legal concept used in some jurisdictions in cases of negligent infliction of emotional distress. This concept states that a person can claim emotional distress if they were in the immediate area of danger and reasonably feared for their own safety due to the defendant’s negligence. This means that even if you were not physically harmed, being in the zone of danger where you feared for your safety can be grounds for claiming emotional distress.

What Damages Can I Recover In A Negligent Infliction Of Emotional Distress In An Assault Case?

In a negligent infliction of emotional distress case arising from an assault, you may be entitled to different forms of compensation:

Medical Expenses

When it comes to recovering damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress, medical expenses often form a significant part of the claim. These expenses are not limited to physical injuries but extend to any costs incurred in treating emotional distress.

This treatment can include sessions with a psychologist or psychiatrist, costs of medication prescribed for managing symptoms like anxiety or depression, and any other medical interventions required to address the emotional impact of the incident. These expenses are quantifiable and can be substantiated with medical bills and records, making them a critical component of the damages claimed.

Pain and Suffering

Pain and suffering damages address the less tangible, but no less real, impacts of emotional distress. This aspect of a claim acknowledges that the effects of an incident go beyond the immediate physical or financial impacts. Victims may experience a wide range of psychological effects, such as persistent anxiety, depression, insomnia, or a decreased ability to enjoy life.

Quantifying pain and suffering can be more complicated, as it involves putting a monetary value on emotional and psychological harm. This often involves expert testimony and a detailed account of how the victim’s life has been altered due to the emotional distress caused by the incident.

Lost Wages

In cases where emotional distress has led to a significant disruption of the victim’s normal life, lost wages may be claimed. If a person is unable to work due to the psychological impact of the incident, the income they have lost can be recovered as part of the damages.

This includes not just wages already lost but also potential future earnings if the emotional distress has a long-term impact on the victim’s ability to work. Documentation, such as pay stubs, employment records, and, in some cases, expert testimony on the victim’s earning capacity, are used to substantiate these claims.

Punitive Damages

Punitive damages serve a different purpose compared to other forms of compensation. While other damages aim to compensate the victim for their losses, punitive damages are intended to punish the defendant for particularly harmful behavior and to deter similar conduct in the future.

These are not awarded in every case and are typically reserved for situations where the defendant’s actions were especially harmful, malicious, or reckless. The goal of punitive damages is to send a message that such behavior is unacceptable and has severe consequences. The awarding of punitive damages depends on the specifics of the case and the jurisdiction’s laws regarding such damages.

Do I Need A Lawyer For Negligent Infliction Of Emotional Distress In An Assault Case?

If you’re facing a situation involving negligent infliction of emotional distress in an assault case, partnering with a qualified personal injury lawyer can be a wise step. LegalMatch is a reliable resource where you can connect with experienced lawyers who are well-equipped to handle your case.

A legal professional can provide the necessary guidance and support to pursue your claim effectively. To explore your legal options and find the right representation, consider using LegalMatch’s services.

star-badge.png

16 people have successfully posted their cases

Find a Lawyer